Logics of Objects as a Framework for the Non-Formal Sciences
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper proposes a particular kind of logics as a formal framework for the non-formal sciences. Such logics of objects turn out to be quite different from recent mathematical logic, but they can be seen as updated versions of the classic conception of logic that is due to Frege, Russell, and the early Carnap. Though obsolete, from the point of view of pure mathematics, logics of this kind may turn out to be of interest for situations beyond the field of pure mathematics, because the task of logic, in such situations, appears to be quite different.—After pointing out the principal difference between logics for the formal and the non-formal sciences (section 1), we consider the fundamental features of a framework for the latter as rigidity, hyper modality and typed relational flexibility (section 2), and we discuss the formal specification of a logic of objects that implements these features (section 3). 1 Internal versus external ontologies The approach to formal logic that was developed and became canonical in the first half of the twentieth century specifies a logic as an uninterpreted language plus a class of semantic interpretations that allows to define truth of a formula of the language. Mathematicians use logics, in this sense, for the characterization of forms of realities. They are not concerned with questions like which formal reality provides the best characterization of the actual world, or what are the actual properties of these and those objects. Instead, the mathematicians are only concerned with internal characterizations of realities. For example, they ask for a formula that characterizes a particular semantic interpretation of an uninterpreted language up to isomorphism, i. e. describes the whole formal structure of this reality. If a semantic interpretation is characterized by a formula, in this sense, we may say that a language allows to express the internal ontology of it. Mathematicians obviously investigate mainly internal ontologies, in this sense.
منابع مشابه
Modeling and Evaluation of Stochastic Discrete-Event Systems with RayLang Formalism
In recent years, formal methods have been used as an important tool for performance evaluation and verification of a wide range of systems. In the view points of engineers and practitioners, however, there are still some major difficulties in using formal methods. In this paper, we introduce a new formal modeling language to fill the gaps between object-oriented programming languages (OOPLs) us...
متن کاملModeling and Evaluation of Stochastic Discrete-Event Systems with RayLang Formalism
In recent years, formal methods have been used as an important tool for performance evaluation and verification of a wide range of systems. In the view points of engineers and practitioners, however, there are still some major difficulties in using formal methods. In this paper, we introduce a new formal modeling language to fill the gaps between object-oriented programming languages (OOPLs) us...
متن کاملProviders and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
In their 2017 article, Mannion and Exworthy provide a thoughtful and theory-based analysis of two parallel trends in modern healthcare systems and their competing and conflicting logics: standardization and customization. This commentary further discusses the challenge of treatment decision-making in times of evidence-based medicine (EBM), shared decision-making and personalized medicine. From ...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملCompeting Logics and Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This paper offers a short commentary on the editorial by Mannion and Exworthy. The paper highlights the positive insights offered by their analysis into the tensions between the competing institutional logics of standardization and customization in healthcare, in part manifested in the conflict between managers and professionals, and endorses the plea of the authors for further research in this...
متن کامل